One Response to Scorpio 2019: Mercury. The Initiates – Humanity. Zaha Hadid. Zuckerberg. Clinton. Johnson. UK Election 12-12.

  1. adam says:

    Your picture of Zuckerberg and Data from Star Trek was hilarious! In one image, I think you captured the essence of moon chain reincarnating souls. I also thoroughly enjoyed your Brexit astrological analysis.

    I do have one suggestion referencing your use of the term “neoliberal”. If one would call current capitalistic systems (e.g. in the United States) as neoliberal, I would argue they are anything but laissez-faire, but far more of a “hands-on”, in a bribe the politicians kind of way.

    To be sure, neoliberalism in a strict sense of the word does not exist anymore as it has reemerged from a blend of New Keynesian and the new classical (aka neoliberal) school of thought. These revolutions in economic thought transpired in post-WWII academia and the current thought represents something that is neither Keynesian nor Neoliberal but both.

    The truth is that we do not have a choice between neoliberal nor socialist paradigms, as this choice does not exist. It is a thoughtform that has outlived any usefulness. Going back upwards of 30 years, economic theorists have reconciled the differences, but this thoughtform finds its continued employment as a fear-based tool used to manipulate voters for political ends.

    The issue at hand is corruption. The United States, the place where the battle between capital and labor will be settled, has at its core two competing issues. One the US is possessed by a great entrepreneurial spirit, the other is the US is possessed by a great deal of corruption. If the US were to simply enforce laws against monopolies, such as the Sherman Act and break up some of these globe-sucking corporations, much would be accomplished. The problem does not lie in an economic paradigm. The problem lies in a failure to enforce laws to protect people against the activities of parasitic monopolies. So much discussion is focused around multinational corporations and how to control them, yet a small coalition of powerful nations enforcing anti-trust laws would immediately disturb the grounds on which these MNCs function.

    Look, even under a strictly new classical school of thought, individuals will pay a higher price for goods/services offered by a monopoly than they would under a system of relatively pure competition. The problem isn’t with neoliberalism, per se.

    I bring this all up because the neoliberal/socialist dyad is a zombie thoughtform brought out to scare folks into voting for demagogues or voting for destructive policies. The real discussion should be about corruption, which is a term lacking any political distinction.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *