21 Responses to Sagittarius 2025: BBC, Propaganda. Russia-Ukraine: European Union. France, Germany. Delhi Explosion. Mars in Sagittarius.

  1. Thanks, Phillip, for such an amazing analysis of esoteric astrology, history, and contemporary events, all seen through the trained occult eye!

  2. nils e osterberg says:

    Your tone has changed a great deal its early in the sign to to make some of your assertions,you left out some of the actions that were made by the Russians to start the conflict in the beginning ,with there special operations to include WAR CRIMES and civilians being raped and pillaged by Russian troops,children stolen and villages pillaged. yes a very special operation in deed!

    1. War is hell and not to excuse that behaviour, but in the heat of battle primordial forces are released that presidents and commanders have no control over. There are thousands of examples of allied forces in WWII, through to massacres in Vietnam, extreme examples by Ukrainians and the ongoing slaughter in Gaza. The latest of which, two unarmed young boys surrendering but murdered point blank.

    2. Steven says:

      Nonsense CNN style propaganda that leaves most of the FACTS out. Russia never wanted nor started this war.

  3. SJ Smith says:

    So very refreshing to read your commentary on Russia and Ukraine. I’ve followed it since 2013 on RT and have been waiting for Putin to act. so the January 23 surgical strike was long overdue IMO.

    I have never understood how Churchill has never been held responsible for all of his evil deeds in S.Africa and Dresden. His ability to turn a phrase was remarkable,

    1. Revisionist history rarely takes into account the general culture of the period, expecting it to live up to the modern era. And it tends to blame one individual who is the product of that culture, shared by many millions. All leaders have their flaws, even Churchill who was esoterically regarded as an “advanced disciple”. As for Dresden, that has been a much debated topic, what was more evil – the imposition of Nazi ideology upon the world, or the Allied response to snuff it out by whatever means available? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Dresden

  4. Janet Thomas says:

    1.Recommended: Two World Wars and Hitler: Who Was Responsible? by Jim Macgregor and John O’Dowd Amazon
    This examination of establishment historians vs the others completely alters everything we have been taught. It also undermines the idea that Churchill could be, in my view, aligned with the wellbeing of humanity. Empire and financial oligarchical selfish interest were behind the orchestration of the two wars to destroy Germany. Strong words. The book is seguey to understanding todays the NWO evolution of Empire.

    2. The Empire of “The City”: The Secret History Of British Financial Power Amazon
    Has several indexed references for Churchill.

    3. Also of value. Published 1890
    On the internet archive website, search for (no quotes) ‘the great red dragon or the city of London ‘ Book title: ‘Great Red Dragon or London Money Power” by LB Woolfolk is the first search find.
    https://archive.org/search?query=The+Great+Red+Dragon%2C+or+city+of+london

    1. “One of the most interesting features of this war period has been the direct contact which has been set up by some of the world leaders with the man in the street and the woman in the home, as witness the talks given by Roosevelt and Churchill.

      … In September 1940 I gave an interpretation of a new Stanza of the Great Invocation, and in that communication I spoke of Divine Embodiments as the highest type of Avatar for which humanity could look at this point in its evolution. I spoke of the activity of the Hierarchy and of Shamballa, should these two divine Agencies decide that intervention in the form of a widespread cataclysm (engulfing all peoples) was necessary, and I referred to the emergence of inspired leadership as another and lower aspect of divine guidance and participation.

      Such inspired leadership is now being given to humanity by Winston Churchill and Franklin D. Roosevelt, in contra-distinction to the focussed leadership of the forces of materialism through Hitler and another man in his group. But it is not with this form of leadership as expressive of the avataric principle that I deal here.

      Such leadership is called forth by elements present in humanity itself. I deal now with a fifth type of Avatar, greater than the other four. These Avatars have not, in this world cycle, experienced human life.” (The Externalisation of the Hierarchy, Alice A. Bailey.)

      Elsewhere the Tibetan refers to FDR and thereby implies that Churchill was on a par with him – or close to. We must also remember DK’s quote:

      “They are powerful, these disciples of Shamballa, headstrong and often cruel; they impose their will and dictate their desires; they make mistakes but they are nevertheless true disciples of Shamballa and are working out the Will of God as much as the disciples and Masters of the Hierarchy are working out the Love of God.”

      Other passage about FDR:

      “The freedom of the individual. These freedoms have been voiced for us in the words of that great first ray disciple, Franklin D. Roosevelt. They are the four essential freedoms …

      … that great disciple, F. D. Roosevelt, who “anchored” the word in a new and more universal sense. It now has a fuller and deeper meaning to humanity.

      … Great and good men appeared and enunciated the truths needed for the New Age, and of these Lincoln, Roosevelt, Browning, Briand and a host of lesser men could be cited. Evil and pernicious men also emerged, such as Hitler and the group he gathered around him, bringing much evil upon the Earth.

      …n politics there are great and wise statesmen who are endeavouring to guide their people wisely but have as yet too much with which to contend; of these Franklin D. Roosevelt was an outstanding modern example, for he gave of his best and died in the service of humanity.

  5. Steven says:

    Another good analysis brother Phillip. The Russiaphobe bleatings of Mertz, Starmer, Kallas, Macronii and Von Der Liar is becoming very old. They seem stuck in a Cold War timewarp. Be this as it may Russia has won and we need PEACE. Neutrality, Donbas for the Donbas and no NATO and secret CIA bases is the way forward. Any esotericist can observe the incoming Rays and the obvious impacts – look UP not DOWN! Namaste.

  6. Thanks Phillip for your as always great and thorough analysis. It might be of interest to watch the interview from Glen Diessen with Professor Michael Carley about the role of the Sovjets and Stalin in the thirties of the former century, where they tried to form a peace alliance with UK, France, Poland and other European countries against the rising nazi’s. The Europeans refused. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhl5qhHYEi8

  7. david says:

    The history of Europe and Russia is linked by the sacred energy of the Planetary Logos, as demonstrated by the fact that the spiritual affluence, or chakra, of the Logos that governs both Russia and Europe is located in Geneva. In other words, Russia cannot distance itself from Europe; rather, it must unite. And what better way to do so than through its “little brothers,” the countries of Eastern Europe? They are its valuable link for this union, provided they feel respected, not intimidated or even humiliated.

    1. David, Your comments suggest that Russia seeks to distance itself from Europe and that they intimidate the smaller nations of eastern Europe? The facts of the matter are that Russia has always been open to good relations to Europe but has been blocked by foolish leaders in Europe working with NATO. Once those leaders are replace with true statesmen – and NATO ceases to exist, Russia can get on with the task of cultivating goodwill with its neighbours and Europe. Russia has already bent over backwards to keep good relations and exercise restraint, it is incumbent upon Europe’s leaders and NATO to let go of their aggression, not Russia.

      Already we see the media twisting Putin’s latest responses to Euro baiting, saying he is prepared to defend Russia, by Europe suggesting that he is threatening them. If anyone believes what the Euro fools are saying, then they are just as foolish.

      1. david says:

        Phillip, I also think that Europe’s distrust of Russia is exaggerated. And I also think that Russia wants (even longs for) to have good relations with Europe. But it must be acknowledged that it’s understandable that European thinking is heavily influenced by the cruel humiliation Ukraine is suffering. Enough of so much death.

        I think that if Russia reduced its military aggression and sought other paths to peace, Europeans’ perception of Russia would change completely, and NATO would no longer have a reason to exist.

        I wish NATO had disappeared when the Berlin Wall fell; it was a great opportunity, but I imagine that due to the economic interests of the large arms companies (almost all of them US-based), its dissolution wasn’t possible.

        1. Again David, it depends upon one’s perspective, influenced by propaganda media and stirred up emotion – or the more erudite global analysts such as Mearscheimer, Blumenthal or Krainer, Diesen, Henningsen – to name a few. Taking these perspectives into account, which includes real history, Ukraine brought the “cruel humiliation” upon itself, by selling itself out to the West/NATO/USA/Europe – who wanted to use it as a proxy to destabilise/attack Russia. Even before that, Ukraine was regarded as the most corrupt nation in Europe.

          Furthermore, the nation has been subjected to a lot of propaganda creating a false ideology, leading to the tragic death of what is estimated now as 1.8 million Ukrainian soldiers – the biggest slaughter since WWI!.

          And of course Russia brought that about, not through an aggressive plan to attack its brother Ukraine, but to respond to the threat on its sovereignty. Russia repeatedly and patiently warned the world about that for decades but especially the last decade. One red line after another was crossed and the Euro-fools are still mindlessly baying for blood.

          So to say that if “Russia reduced its military aggression and sought other paths to peace” is a nonsense, it has already done that. It has bent over backwards to accommodate all diplomatic advances, been betrayed by the Minsk agreements and had to deal with manipulative corporations and banks. They are fed up and who can blame them, the hollow peace agreement will not work as it is and Russia may be forced to complete its task militarily.

          I am reminded of that great anthem from Patti Smith: “The power to dream to rule – To wrestle the earth from fools.”

          1. david says:

            Well, regarding patriotic sentiments, I think it’s best not to take extreme positions. This type of feeling is very relative and tends to be exclusionary, so it’s better not to interpret it radically.

            And on the other hand, regarding more global sentiments that believe humanity is a whole (and not a part or a nation), I don’t believe in “good guys and bad guys.” Rather, I believe in an inspiring duality. As Patti Smith herself suggests in her poem:

            “Vengeful aspect became suspect
            And bending low as if to hear
            And the armies ceased advancing
            Because the people had their ear
            And the shepherds and the soldiers
            Lay beneath the stars
            Exchanging visions and laying arms”

            1. Not sure what you are saying here David, and who is expressing “patriotic sentiments” or “taking “extreme positions … interpret radically”? It might appear to be radical to those who are conservative or who have run with a long term propaganda narrative. But if you think that is the case with my perspective, I do not take the side of Russia, simply the truth as I recognise it. One day Russia-Ukraine will become whole again.

              In this critical period of the forerunner, there are actually “good guys and bad guys” – as I have continually referred to in recent years. The Materialistic Forces have been working through the Western nations, trying to prevent the esoteric triangle of the Aquarian cycle emerging: The leading nations of USA, UK and Russia.

              Very ironic as the UK and USA were world leaders at various points of history, now UK is blatantly blocking that progress as was the previous US administration. The current admin has been quite ambiguous -blowing hot and cold and its proposed peace plan is not worth the paper it is printed on. Many observers now, both exoteric and esoteric recognise Russia as the only adult in the room.

              1. david says:

                Many of us from different parts of the world recognize profound truths in Bailey’s books. These include truths concerning the three key nations for humanity’s Aquarian future: Russia, England, and the USA, as well as Europe and its mediating role between America/West and Asia/East.

                From my own limited perspective, I imagine it’s not easy for any of these four actors to navigate the new energies that the Age of Aquarius proposes.

                On the one hand, it’s clear that the old behavioral patterns of European countries, including England, contaminate and undermine the decisions that the European Union must make. On the other hand, a desire for grandeur is evident in the powerful dynamics of the USA. And finally, in Russia’s position, one can perceive (at least I perceive it this way) an inflexible authoritarianism; one only has to look at the situation of the many artists, politicians, and journalists who have dared to oppose this authoritarianism.

                This is why I say that “there is no good or bad,” but rather karmic inertias that have already expired, destructive inertias…, destruction that, although it is painful to recognize, opens the way for the New.

      2. All hands Nato against the Russia
        (by Jeffrey Sachs)
        The war in Ukraine is the culmination of a 30-year collapse of the European security order.
        Far from being inevitable or predetermined, it was born from a systematic dismantling of the principles that rooted the post-Cold War agreement: the neutrality of States positioned between military blocs, the commitment of the USA and Germany not to expand the Natto East, in the former Soviet sphere, and the doctrine of the Security Organization and Cooperation in Europe (Osce) according to that security must be indivisible, that is that no State can strengthen security for the sake of another.
        Contrary to the dominant Western narratives describing Russia as the one-sided aggressor, it is alleged that the subsequent US administrations, supported in key moments by the EU, have moved Ukraine away from its constitutionally sounded neutrality, dragging it into a geopolitical conflict. At different times – from 1990, 1994, 2008, 2014, 2015, 2021 and 2022 until today – explicit diplomatic routes (exit ramps) have existed that could have secured Ukraine’s sovereignty, protected European security and prevent war. Every time, they have been repelled by the West.
        When Ukraine gained independence in 1991, neutrality was a pillar of the political agreement. The Declaration of State Sovereignty of 1990 stated that the country intended to be a “permanently neutral state” that would not have joined military blocs. Such a principle became law: Article 18 of the 1996 Constitution, binds the State to neutrality and non-alignment. The Ukrainian public opinion reinforced this position. From the 90s until the beginning of 2014, the majority has always opposed joining Nato.
        From 1989 to 1991, Western leaders have repeatedly assured Soviet officials that Nato would not expand East if Moscow accepted German reunification, as well documented in declassified archives. On February 9, 1990, US Secretary of State Baker said to Gorbaciov: “Nato’s jurisdiction will not move one inch to the East.” German Foreign Minister Genscher declared in January 1990: “There will be no expansion of the territory of Nato towards the East”.
        The final Act of Helsinki (1975) and the Paris Charter (1990) established that security in Europe had to be collective, not zero sum. The European Security Charter of Osce 1999 reaffirmed: “No State… he will increase his own security at the expense of the security of other States”. Enlargement, especially in Ukraine, violated this principle.
        In 1994, Ukraine returned to Russia control of the Soviet-era nuclear arsenal based on the Budapest Memorandum, in a security context defined by three conditions: 1) Ukraine would have remained neutral 2) NATO would not have expanded towards Ukraine 3) European security would have been based on Osce principles, not on the politics of blocking.
        (… ) The tragedy is that, with the passing of the 90s, the US strategy has conformed to the logic articulated by Brzezinski in The Great Chessboard (1997): “Without Ukraine, Ukraine ceases to be an Eurasian empire.” “If Moscow takes back control of Ukraine… Russia regains the means to become a powerful imperial State. Such a thought has since shaped the US strategic perspective. The aim was then to incorporate Ukraine into NATO.
        (… ) In 2004, the USA and EU supported the Orange Revolution, providing financial assistance to civil society groups through the National Endowment for Democracy, Usaid, and various foundations. (… ) Then, in 2008, at the Nato summit in Bucharest, and despite the strong opposition from Germany and France, the USA forced Nato to declare: “Ukraine and Georgia will become members”. The German Chancellor Merkel later admitted: “From the Ukrainian point of view, this would have been a declaration of war [for Putin]”. But the public opinion remained in a vast majority against the accession: presidential candidate Viktor Yanukovich won the elections of 2009/10 on a platform of neutrality and his administration passed a law codifying Ukraine as a state not part of the bloc.
        However, pro-Nato forces in Ukraine and the West saw an opportunity when in 2013 Yanukovich postponed the signing of an association agreement with the EU, which triggered mass protests fuelled by the US. The US regime change apparatus went into action. (… ) On February 21, 2014 the EU mediated an agreement with Yanukovich, based on constitutional reforms, national unity government and early elections. Instead, in a few hours, armed groups occupied government buildings and Yanukovich fled, but of course he didn’t resign. Parliament removed it without constitutional procedures and the USA gave its support to the regime of fact: the EU remained silent and let the American deep state take charge.
        The new government adopted nationalist policies and will declare an “anti-terrorism” military operation against the protests in the ethnic Russian eastern regions. This militarized a political dispute and made a compromise impossible. The new political class started talking about expelling Russia from its naval base in Crimea. In the end, Russia took over Crimea, bringing concerns for national security related to the Black Sea Fleet.
        To stop the fighting in the East, Russia helped to mediate the Minsk II agreement. Such intention, approved unanimously by Security Council resolution 2202, provided for a ceasefire, autonomy (“special status”) for Donetsk and Lugansk, constitutional reforms to protect the Russian ethnic minority and the withdrawal of heavy weapons. Ukraine refused to implement the agreement, especially the autonomy for the Donbass. Merkel later admitted that the purpose of the agreement was to “give Ukraine time” to strengthen its own military force.
        (… ) Between 2015 and 2021, Ukraine became a Nato partner, thanks to joint exercises, new command structures in accordance with Alliance standards, training missions between the USA and the UK, intelligence integration and, above all, billions of dollars in arms transfers. In 2021, Ukraine had the largest army in Europe outside of Russia
        In December 2021, Russia presented two draft treaties, one for the USA and the other for the EU, inviting the West to renounce Ukraine’s accession to NATO, withdraw Nato weapons from Russian borders, return to 1997 deployment levels and restore Osce’s indivisible security principles.
        The US refused to negotiate with Russia about the enlargement, claiming that Nato’s “open door policy” was none of his business. The failure of the attempt has led Russia to launch the Special Military Operation (Smo). In 2023 Secretary-General Nato Stoltenberg summed up the situation like this: “The context was that Putin, in fall 2021, had declared, and in fact, sent, a draft treaty that he wanted Nato to sign, to promise that there would be no further expansion. It was a prerequisite for not invading Ukraine. Obviously we didn’t sign it…. So he went to war to prevent Nato from approaching its borders. He got the exact opposite”.
        (… ) In short, the war in Ukraine was not the result of ancient hatred or a sudden act of aggression, but the predictable result of a series of decisions by the USA and EU that dismantled Ukrainian neutrality, rejected diplomacy with Russia and subordinated Ukrainian security to A failed western geopolitical strategy. A lasting solution to the war requires a return to the principles that led the post-Cold War period: Ukraine’s neutrality, Europe’s indivisible security, and genuine diplomacy between the EU and Russia .

  8. Full moon meditation reflections 4-12-25
    Army of the Light

    In this era of many distracting crises that demand our attention and comprehension, it is vitally important to keep regular daily meditation practice.

    To regularly release cares and worries that constantly demand attention. To invoke and invite healing solar forces into every fibre of your being.

    To quieten the activity of the lower mind that is constantly responding to stimuli – speculating upon the future or looking back into the past.

    To cultivate the present or the Presence – the soul or spirit that comprehends the purpose of incarnation – and how it plays its part within the greater community of souls.

    To penetrate more deeply into the mysteries of existence. To visualise one’s greatest potential and realise its manifestation. Every individual meditation contribution enables the soul of Humanity to awaken into a greater expansion of awareness.

    Here is where we get to reject the sense of powerlessness in the face of selfish, dominating forces on our planet. Where we cultivate the subjective and emerging paradigm of the Aquarian Era – co-operation and community that is replacing the Piscean past.

    The Forces of Materialism know that their time is up, thrashing madly like cornered beasts in their desperate attempt to hang on to power and stay in control, cultivating ever more radical fear-mongering, propaganda and lies.

    Do not be duped, recognise, reject and resist their hollow rhetoric. Now is the time for the Army of the Light to hold the line, to make a concerted effort to dissolve and diminish the darkness.

  9. SZILVIA M HUNT says:

    Gratitude Phillip to keep us informed in an honest, spiritually dedicated and unbiased manner as ever.We need to hear the facts of history and honestly looking at the underlying causes of all the shadows of humanity, so over time humanity will find solutions. Your dedication, brave commitment is truly appreciate and is heard by those who are ready to listen. The fourth kingdom of humanity, as a hole will prevail through conflict. Nonetheless over time

  10. Heidi says:

    Full Moon in Sagittarius, an experience I shall never forget!

    I was in Switzerland for mom’s 106th birthday, on December 2, in a Center for older persons in Zurich. My brother from Brazil was present, too. A beautiful and very happy event.
    When Mami was tired and gone to sleep, Max and I went to a big store to search and find a pyjama for our granddaughter in Brazil. Again back in the street, there was a tramway caos and we had to wait a very long time in the cool night. Next day, I laid to bed with fever, sinusitis and bronchitis.

    December 4, 2025, a very important Full Moon Meditation, and I couldn’t even think!

    LESSON: Never permit to nothing and nobody, to loose your rhythms. From hearing the Celestial Music, you may fall to Earth very quickly…! Even if you were full of Goodwill to prepare everything for the visit of your brother or a friend. First, you must love yourself, the daily activities, your studies, your meditations, your webinars. Only afterwards, you may think to help others.

    I am a double Capricorn and Mercury is there , too. I, sincerely hope that Christmas, my birthday, and the Capricorn Full Moon will restore me.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *